Agentic workflows for your network
A clearer decision. A stronger program. A useful conversation.
Three ways the planned Ondori operating system connects your network’s intelligence to its daily work—from resolving a reporting difference to shaping a supplier program and helping a member act on an offer.
Planned workflows for the platform launching in 2027; availability depends on your agreed scope. All organizations, people, and information shown are fictional.
Resolve a reporting discrepancy.
Two program summaries disagree. Bring the source information, an AI-prepared explanation, and the responsible people into the same review.
- THE TRIGGER
- A member and supplier report different totals.
- THE PARTICIPANTS
- Alex Morgan · Westbridge Supply · Alder Manufacturing
Summarize the available evidence and prepare the question that needs resolving.
YOUR PEOPLE DECIDEThe GPO approves what to share and decides whether the record should change.
Understand the difference
Start with the program, period, and supporting records. AI prepares an explanation tied to that context and identifies what still needs checking.
Approve the next request
Alex Morgan reviews the proposed question and chooses the information to share with Westbridge Supply and Alder Manufacturing.
Bring the evidence together
The member explains the reporting period. The supplier responds with supporting context. Each response stays attached to review NR–024.
Make the decision
The GPO requests further evidence where needed, then records a correction or no-change decision. The explanation and any later reopening stay with the review.
A resolved difference, with the reasoning retained.
What to measure: Time to resolution, repeat exceptions, and a decision supported by evidence.
Shape a program your network can act on.
A supplier sees a reason to revisit program participation. Explore options against prior-year evidence, understand the commercial trade-offs, and carry a chosen revision through GPO review.
- THE TRIGGER
- Past participation suggests a program target deserves review.
- THE PARTICIPANTS
- Supplier program owner · GPO approver · Authorized members
Compare the current target with a supported alternative and explain participation and rebate-exposure trade-offs.
YOUR PEOPLE DECIDEThe supplier chooses the draft; the GPO approves its terms, audience, and publication.
Explore the evidence with AI
Compare the current target with a supported alternative using the same prior-program information. Inspect the sources and how the options change the retrospective scenario.
Choose the commercial move
Retain the terms, edit an option, or use it in the supplier’s draft. Keep the explanation and a worked calculation with that choice.
Review the exact program version
The GPO reviews the proposed terms, qualifying products, member audience, and dates. Feedback returns to the supplier before an approved version is published.
Connect the program to participation
Authorized members discover the program and relevant products. A product or program inquiry carries its context into the supplier conversation.
Follow the actual result
Track progress against the approved terms and available purchasing evidence. Review statements and distinguish estimated, supplier-confirmed, and paid amounts where supported by authoritative records.
A considered program, an approved audience, and a clear path to participation.
What to measure: Completed program reviews, participation, qualifying progress, and later outcomes supported by evidence.
Find the product. Start the right conversation.
A member has a purchasing question. Connect the catalog, offers they are authorized to see, and the supplier conversation—so useful discovery has a next step.
- THE TRIGGER
- Westbridge Supply needs to compare offers for a product.
- THE PARTICIPANTS
- Member buyer · Supplier representative · GPO program team
Explain available purchasing context and surface what still needs checking before the member approaches a supplier.
YOUR PEOPLE DECIDEThe member chooses the product and inquiry. The supplier confirms the commercial details; purchasing decisions stay with the member.
Find and compare
Search the catalog by product or SKU. Compare authorized offers for the same product by unit price, pack size, and validity; check the relevant program context.
Ask with the context attached
Westbridge starts an inquiry about Alder’s offer. The product, offer, and question stay together, giving the supplier a clear starting point for its response.
Work through the details
The supplier responds in the conversation. Where a discussion is useful, a meeting and agenda stay connected to the relationship and the question being considered.
Keep the next step visible
Record who will follow up and what remains to be confirmed. Retain the conversation’s outcome, including a decision not to proceed; an inquiry is not an order.
An informed member decision and an accountable next step.
What to measure: Member participation, supplier response time, and inquiries reaching a documented next step.
Measure what actually happened
An opportunity is a starting point.
An outcome needs evidence.
Corrected information, a resolved question, or a documented no-change decision can all be useful results. An estimated opportunity is not realized cash, credit, or a proven saving.
AI-supported program comparisons are retrospective scenarios. The measures shown here are proposed ways to assess a workflow, not results already achieved by Ondori.
Define a useful first workflowLaunching 2027 · Now signing GPOs
Let’s talk about
your network’s next chapter.
Get on a call to learn about our launch partnerships for 2027.